Shawna M.’s presentation on Japanese writer Yukio Mishima on March 17^th was an insightful and nuanced synthesis of four decades of reading and discussing his works.

Three questions constituted her presentation’s scaffolding: why Mishima didn’t win the Nobel Prize in Literature, what are hallmarks of his writing, and is he relevant today (he died by seppuku in 1970, age 46).  

Mishima was nominated five times for the Nobel Prize in Literature during the 1960s (Wikipedia). He tackled very controversial topics, such as glorious (suicide) versus ignoble death (dying in hospital), sexual ambiguity/eroticism, cruelty/brutality versus perfection, imperialism versus boorish democracy. Moreover, Mishima was in the public eye: a model, actor, Kendo master, Samurai acolyte, the subject of lurid photos that he arranged. Was he too politically or socially controversial to win? Was he too young?  

Three books are especially noteworthy in his literary evolution. The success of Confessions of a Mask (1949) allowed Mishima to travel Europe and the Americas extensively. His outer and inner worlds expanded exponentially with new ideas, possibilities, and challenges. This may also have been the start of gay relationships, but Shawna cautioned there is much debate about his bisexuality (which, at times, overshadows discussions about his writings).  

In The Temple of the Golden Pavilion (1956), the protagonist, a monk, becomes psychologically unhinged by the Temple’s beauty contra friends’ mutual abusiveness. He eventually sets fire to the temple. Shawna noted the concept of “a beautiful, violent, futile gesture” was introduced here and it informed Mishima’s later years. The Sound of Waves(1959), by contrast, describes the idealized Japan Mishima believed is possible, wherein morality, hard work, and community are foundational.

Yes, Mishima is relevant today. The Sea of Fertility was written in the last years of his life and is a tetralogy. Through the characters’ lives, the personal philosophy of Mishima—a man of many contradictions—is helpfully explained. He skillfully interweaves Japanese and European literary techniques. Moods are created not by merely stating them, but through evocative metaphors. He tenaciously and unapologetically explores the proverbial “fine line” between good and evil. While his topics, plots, and characters may seem too daunting to engage, Shawna praised Mishima’s work as both profound and accessible. She concluded her engaging presentation by reading excerpts from three books to share the imagery, clarity, and beauty of his writing.

Written by Barbara R.

On February 9th, 1906, Annie Davidson held the first meeting of the Calgary Women’s Literary Club in the parlour of her home. At this meeting, founding members established by-laws, elected officers, and selected the club’s first literary program. One hundred and twenty years later, women across Calgary, who share a passion for the written word, continue to come together to discuss literature while honouring the legacy of the women who came before them.

To mark this 120th Anniversary, members gathered for a lively celebratory lunch at Park by Sidewalk Citizen on February 11th. The room was filled with laughter, holiday updates, and a shared appreciation for the club’s long and impressive history. We are especially grateful to Robin S., our Social Chair, and to the team at Park for organizing such a wonderful event. Robin also provided a delicious cake for our first meeting of the Spring 2026 session.

War, pandemics, moon landings, and the advent of the Internet are just some of the momentous events that have occurred since the founding of the CWLC. In 1906, when our foremothers were gathering to discuss literature, significant events were also unfolding around the world. Undoubtedly, these developments would have found their way into the conversations of these curious and engaged women.

• Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen identifies the magnetic North Pole and establishes that it moves over time.
• San Francisco experiences the devastating earthquake and fire in April, 1906.
• Wilfred Laurier is Prime Minister of Canada (1896-1911).
• Alexander Cameron Rutherford was the first Premier of Alberta (1905-1911).
• President Theodore Roosevelt sails to the Panama Canal in November, 1906. This was the first time a sitting U.S. president made an official trip outside the country. President Roosevelt was also the first American to win a Nobel Peace Prize.
• The first permanent Canadian movie theatre, the Ouimetoscope, opens in Montreal.
• The passenger steamer SS Valencia ran aground off Vancouver Island resulting in one of Canada’s worst maritime disasters.
• Some notable books published in or around 1906: Kim by Rudyard Kipling (1906), The Call of the Wild by Jack London (1906), The Jungle by Upton Sinclair (1906), The House of Mirth by Edith Wharton (1905), A Room with a View by E.M. Forster (1908), Anne of Green Gables by Lucy Maude Montgomery (1908). Many Canadian female poets were beginning to make their mark: Jean Blewett, Helena Coleman, Sophia Almon Hensley, Elizabeth Roberts MacDonald, and Elizabeth Nuttall Hopkins among others.
• The Alpine Club is founded in Winnipeg with a membership fee of $0.25.

The CWLC will be celebrating its 125th Anniversary in 2031! This will be an exciting event and milestone for our club members and for the broader Calgary literary and historical community.

For more information on the history of the CWLC, please visit the Our History page.

Written by Janet H. and Mooréa G.

On Tuesday, March 10^th, Thea K. impressed her audience with her first CWLC presentation. Her author of choice was the prolific American-born writer Patricia Highsmith (1921-1995), who was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature and received numerous awards and other nominations.

As readers, we are often challenged to keep the author’s biography separate from their work. We ask questions such as, “Is this book autobiographical, and does it matter?” and “Can we still appreciate the writing if we don’t agree with or have respect for what we know about the writer?” Thea’s presentation encouraged her audience to grapple with these questions in the face of a deeply flawed writer and her unsettling yet compelling works.

Highsmith was born into a broken family and, to escape her feelings of abandonment and her tumultuous relationship with her mother, she found solace in reading. At the age of nine, she developed a fascination with abnormal psychology and began writing detailed diaries. “In her later years,” states Thea, “Highsmith became increasingly isolated, struggling with alcoholism and depression, and displaying antisocial and bigoted attitudes.” Like many of her fictional characters, Highsmith experienced numerous failed relationships and love affairs.

Highsmith wrote twenty-two novels and nine short story collections. Her literary influences included Dostoevsky, Kafka, Edgar Allan Poe, and Joseph Conrad. Highsmith’s works are filled with “psychologically complex criminals, moral ambiguity, suspenseful atmospheres, and an unflinching examination of the darker impulses within seemingly ordinary people.” 

Thea provided detailed summaries on Strangers on a Train (1950), The Blunderer (1954), and The Tremor of Forgery (1969). These novels vividly illustrate Highsmith’s reoccurring themes of moral collapse, guilt, paranoia, anxiety, and complicity in evil.

A lengthy and enthusiastic Q&A period followed Thea’s presentation, as members continued to wrestle with the reader’s paradox of admiring the work while questioning the writer. 

Written by Mooréa G.

Our good friend and fellow club member, Wilda Dow, passed away on February 23 at the age of 95 after a short illness. Wilda started with the CWLC in 2015 and only in 2025 did she find it harder to leave her home for outside engagements. She enjoyed the camaraderie and friendships she made in the club and presented two authors: Amy Tan and Amor Towles. 

Wilda was an avid reader, as her girls will attest, and when presenting, she organized her thoughts and communicated what she loved most about each author’s writing. All three of her girls came to CWLC when Wilda was presenting and, although she was a good public speaker, she always felt it was good to be supported by family while she spoke into the microphone.

Wilda belonged to a second book club and had strong opinions as to plot, character build-up, themes, and other interesting anecdotes of each book reviewed. Any time a friend shared the news about a new book, Wilda’s most often reply was, “Oh yes, I just finished it!”

We will miss Wilda with her gentle smile and warm heart. One of her favourite sayings was:

 “Life’s hard! But what’s that got to do with anything? (Eleanor Roosevelt)

You can read more about Wilda in her obituary at: https://www.piersons.ca/obituaries/wilda-dow

Written by Cathy R.

What a fantastic start to the CWLC Spring 2026 session! As we continue our theme on “Nominees for the Nobel Prize in Literature Who Never Won,” Judith C. presented an eloquent and well-researched presentation on writer Christa Wolf. This was Judith’s inaugural presentation.

Christa Wolf was a German novelist and essayist, considered to be one of the most significant writers of East Germany, and later, reunified Germany. The Guardian called her the most important writer of her time, and she was nominated for the Nobel Prize for Literature multiple times between the years of 1987 to 2007.

Wolf’s work reflected authenticity and a personal moral engagement. She spoke her mind and was often punished for it: bad reviews were published and her books were not sold in East German bookstores for several years. Yet, she was an internationally recognized author who wrote many best sellers that were widely translated.  

Her novel Patterns of Childhood (1976) is semi-autobiographical about growing up in Nazi Germany. This novel is considered to be one of the finest books to deal with the country’s war time past, and Wolf bore the criticism of the East German regime when she spoke against it. After the fall of the Berlin Wall, when Stasi records were released, she confirmed what she had long suspected: she had been under scrutiny for thirty years. She also bore the criticism of the west for not speaking out more. Wolf was a feminist writer who wrote what she wanted despite the criticism.  

Judith read from Cassandra (1983), considered to be Wolf’s most important work. Cassandra is a character in the Trojan War, a prophetess who was ignored. Cassandra’s retelling reinterprets the war as a shift from a matriarchal society to a patriarchal one. “If you only read one book by Christa Wolf,” Judith said, “read this one.”

Written by Sandra E. and Mooréa G.

The commonly used phrase “the year has gone by in a flash” has become something of a cliché at this time of year. Looking back over the past twelve months, it certainly feels true, but perhaps it is because of our engagement in the year, much like flipping through pages of a gripping book. If we think of a quickly passing year as a “page-turner,” this cliché takes on a more positive tone.

For many, a book (like a year) is meant to be slowly savoured. Whether you prefer a page-turner or a tea-sipping epic novel, both offer stories, characters, moments, and themes that stay with us long after the book is closed. And there is always anticipation for the upcoming book, with pages filled with the excitement of the unknown. Perhaps this is how we can look upon the quick passing of 2025 and the coming of 2026.

In spring 2025, CWLC completed its program on Irish writers. “Irish Writers” was a fun theme, which offered our members Irish culture (including a lot of coarse language), writers from the past and present, and Calgary’s St. James Pub. The fall 2025 program, “Nominees for the Nobel Prize in Literature Who Never Won,” has included wonderful presentations and literary greats such as James Joyce, Margaret Atwood, Leo Tolstoy, Elie Wiesel, Janet Frame, and Mark Twain. While CWLC is currently on a break, we continue our theme and meetings on March 3, 2026. Guests are always welcome!

Robbie Burns’s poem “Auld Lang Syne” has become a familiar song shared at new year’s eve gatherings and at other events that mark significant moments of transition. Auld lang syne is literally translated to “old long since” and loosely means “for the sake of old times.” As a new year approaches, the 18th-century Scottish poem/song reminds us not to forget the friendships and experiences of the past. The new year is a good time to reflect on what has been, while welcoming what comes today and in the future.

Happy New Year and Happy Reading to All!

CWLC – posted by Mooréa G.

Auld Lang Syne by Robert Burns (1788)

Should old acquaintance be forgot,
and never brought to mind?
Should old acquaintance be forgot,
and auld lang syne?

For auld lang syne, my dear,
for auld lang syne,
we’ll take a cup of kindness yet,
for auld lang syne.

And surely you’ll buy your pint cup!
and surely I’ll buy mine!
And we’ll take a cup o’ kindness yet,
for auld lang syne.

Chorus

We two have run about the hills,
and picked the daisies fine;
But we’ve wandered many a weary foot,
since auld lang syne.

Chorus

We two have paddled in the stream,
from morning sun till dine;
But seas between us broad have roared
since auld lang syne.

Chorus

And there’s a hand my trusty friend!
And give me a hand o’ thine!
And we’ll take a right good-will draught,
for auld lang syne.

Chorus

Ernest Hemingway famously claimed, “All modern American literature comes from one book by Mark Twain called Huckleberry Finn. […] There was nothing before. There has been nothing as good since.” How can such high praise be reconciled when The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is both one of the most beloved and one of the most controversial novels in American history? 

On Tuesday, November 18, Janet H. delivered a well-researched and passionate presentation on Mark Twain. Janet examined the man, the writer, and Huckleberry Finn’s lasting place in modern literature. Twain’s writings address the horrors and injustices of slavery, and Janet handled this sensitive subject with care and insight. 

After showing Conan O’Brien’s heartfelt acceptance speech for the Mark Twain award for American Humor, Janet admitted she knew little about the writer before her research—other than knowing he was funny. She learned numerous autobiographies exist (“shouldn’t there be only one?”) and recommended The Autobiography of Mark Twain (1959), edited by Charles Neider.

Mark Twain was born Samuel Langhorne Clemens in 1835 and spent his childhood along the Mississippi River in Hannibal, Missouri. Twain was adventurous, humorous, and empathetic by nature. Upon his father’s death, Twain lived a “Charles Dickens-type misery” as a printer’s apprentice. He later became a journeyman printer, a steamboat pilot, a Confederate soldier, and a newspaper reporter. Writing about fraud and corruption was dangerous, so he began using the pen name “Mark Twain” (a nautical term). His extensive travels through Europe, the Middle East, and Hawaii inspired his humorous and satirical travel writings. Twain married and had four children—only one living passed the age of thirty.

While living in Hartford, Connecticut, Twain wrote many of his classics: The Adventures of Tom Sawyer (1876), The Prince and the Pauper (1881), Life on the Mississippi (1883), and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884). Huckleberry Finn tells the story of fourteen-year-old Huck, who befriends Jim, an enslaved man escaping toward freedom. Narrated in Huck’s colloquial voice, they share an eventful journey as they drift down the Mississippi River. Throughout the story, Huck struggles between his own conscience and societal prejudices. The book faced controversy as early as 1885: It was described as “coarse, trashy, inelegant, irreligious, obsolete, inaccurate, and mindless.” In later decades, it was challenged and even banned because of its racial slurs and prejudices of the time. Modern readers who defend the novel argue that Twain’s language is a deliberate critique of racism and slavery rather than an endorsement. 

Upon spending so much time with Mark Twain and his works, Janet joked that she was sad to part with her “new boyfriend.” 

Janet’s presentation wraps up the CWLC Fall 2025 session. Spring 2026 meetings will commence on Tuesday, March 3. Please refer to the program schedule for upcoming presentations on “Nominees for the Nobel Prize in Literature Who Never Won.”  

Have a wonderful holiday season and HAPPY READING!

Posted by Mooréa G.

In reference to her chosen author and to other authors showcased in the Fall 2025 program—Margaret Atwood, Janet Frame, Elie Wiesel, James Joyce, Leo Tolstoy, and Mark Twain—Sandra E. asks, “Who are we to take on the titans of literature? There is so much to say!”

On Tuesday, November 11^th, via Zoom, Sandra shared her research and interest in her literary titan, Leo Tolstoy. Sandra’s biographical overview and focused discussion of Anna Karenina offered listeners an engaging introduction to one of the greatest and most influential writers in any language. 

Count Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy was born in 1828 at his family’s estate south of Moscow. He was orphaned as a young boy and raised by relatives. Tolstoy’s semi-autobiographical novels, Childhood, Boyhood, and Youth (1852-1856), brought him early acclaim as a writer. He went on to write numerous novels and novellas, most notably War and Peace (1869), Anna Karenina (1878), and The Death of Ivan Ilyich (1886).

In 1862, Tolstoy married Sofia (Sonya) and the couple had thirteen children, eight of whom lived into adulthood. Not only was Sofia a wife and mother, but also the writer’s secretary, editor, and transcriber. Sofia kept a detailed journal describing her troubled family life and her often cruel husband. Sofia’s diaries were published after her death and the life and marriage of the Tolstoys were later portrayed in the film The Last Station and in a BBC Radio series entitled “Mrs. Tolstoy, A simple Life.”

Anna Karenina famously begins with the line, “All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” Sandra explores the novel’s three main families—Stiva and Dolly Oblonsky, Alexei and Anna Karenin, and Konstantin and Kitty Levin—demonstrating how their lives are often passionately and tragically intertwined. The novel highlights late nineteenth-century tensions between urban and rural life, love and duty, and resilience and despair.

Tolstoy fell into a profound moral and existential crisis in the late 1870s. Tolstoy turned to religion and the simple living of the Russian countryside. The character of Levin in Anna Karenina is often believed to share the same philosophy as the writer himself.

Tolstoy was nominated numerous times between 1901 and 1909 for the Nobel Prize in Literature, though he never won. When he learned of the nominations, he was relieved that he did not win as it spared him “the painful necessity of dealing in some way with the money […] generally regarded as very necessary and useful, but which I regard as the source of every kind of evil.”

In answer to Sandra’s question, “Who are we to take on the titans of literature,” the answer is simple: thoughtful, well-read members of the CWLC—including Sandra—who engage with the literary greats with curiosity and appreciation.

The Memorial Park library was closed on November 11^th in observance of Remembrance Day.

Posted by Mooréa G.

How should one approach the hugely influential and celebrated twentieth-century writer James Joyce in preparation for a forty-minute presentation? Cecilia K. did it with great control and clarity as she focussed primarily on the unsettled, short story “Eveline” from Joyce’s short story collection, Dubliners (1914). 

Unlike a Joycean lecture, Cecilia encouraged group participation and provided handouts of “Eveline” for close reading. After reading the story in its entirety, Cecilia asked discerning questions, such as “Can we describe Eveline’s final scene as an epiphany or is it more a matter of paralysis?” And, “How is paralysis used as a metaphor for Joyce’s doomed and self-defeating life of Dublin?” An in-depth discussion by the members followed each of the questions.

To assist her own close reading of Joyce’s works, Cecilia consulted Harold Bloom’s Modern Critical Views: James Joyce and The Art of the Short Story by Dana Gioia and R.S. Gwynn. She also noted and shared Edna O’Brien’s excellent introduction to Dubliners (Signet Classic, 1991 edition). 

The Irish-born writer James Joyce was a modernist writer known for his experimental writing techniques, including interior monologue and stream of consciousness. In Dubliners, Joyce portrayed “a chapter in the moral history of [his] country,” focusing on the moral and spiritual paralysis of Dublin. Many Irish readers were angered by his sentiments and of his handling of sexual and family relationships, drawing much criticism to this and other of Joyce’s works. 

Members greatly enjoyed and applauded Cecilia’s bite-sized approach to James Joyce. Now, who’s ready for Ulysses?!

Written by Mooréa G.

Shabbat Candle Sticks. Challah Cover. Spice Box. Havdalah Candle. Passover Plate. Matzah Cover.

Natashia H. began her presentation on Elie Wiesel by showing the things that had to be left behind when he and his family were deported. These are the symbols of his culture and religion.

Elie Wiesel was born in Romania in 1928. By 1944, Wiesel and his family believed they had escaped being captured by the Nazis. But, they were not so lucky. They were deported first to Auschwitz then to Buchenwald. Wiesel was fifteen. By the time he was released, he had lost his family and all connections to his religion. 

After a time spent in an orphanage in France, learning French, learning table manners, and learning how to interact with people, he wanted to regain his Jewish identity. He wanted to learn about Jewish mysticism, the essence of divinity, and understand the wisdom of God.

As an intellectual and a journalist, Wiesel became a political activist, a strong defender of human rights, and an advocate for justice. He wanted to confront hatred, write about dignity, and spread wisdom.

Wiesel asked the essential questions of our human existence: What do we do when we encounter chaos? Do we confront it or do we hide from it? How can you make a change within your sphere of influence? How can you make a difference? And, perhaps the most important question of all, how do we fight indifference?  

Natashia encouraged us to perform acts of kindness, as well as acts of critical thinking. As we do at our weekly CWLC meetings, we talk to each other, we listen, we talk about ideas, and we ask questions.

Chaos is darkness. We have the opportunity to be the light.  

Written by Sandra E.